Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2021
Effectiveness, economical and safety aspects of growth hormone (GH) therapy in growth promoting doses in patients with isolated GH deficiency after the attainment of near-final height. Is there a need to modify the criteria of therapy withdrawal?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smyczyńska Joanna, Hilczer Maciej, Lewinski Andrzej, Smyczyńska Urszula, Stawerska Renata
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Apart from growth promotion, growth hormone (GH) has important metabolic effects. Patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD) should be treated with GH throughout life. Current criteria for growth promoting therapy withdrawal in Poland differ from the latest recommendations. Aim of the study To assess cost-effectiveness and safety of continuation of GH therapy in growth promoting doses in patients with isolated GHD after the attainment of near-final height (near-FH) and the incidence of persistent GHD after the therapy withdrawal.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 160 children with isolated GHD (height < 3 centile, GH peak < 10.0 µg/l), who continued GH therapy for growth promotion after the attainment of near-FH (height velocity 2.0) at near-FH and incidence of severe GHD in retesting (performed in 62 patients).
RESULTS: Height gain after near-FH was 1.1 ±0.8 cm in boys and 1.0 ±0.8 in girls. Increase of height by 1.0 cm required on average 487 mg of GH (264 injections). IGF-1 concentrations at near-FH were increased in 39 patients, with no clinical side effects. None of the patients retested had GH peak 10.0 µg/l.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no rationale to continue GH therapy in growth promoting doses in the patients with isolated GHD after fulfilling the criteria of near-FH.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 160 children with isolated GHD (height < 3 centile, GH peak < 10.0 µg/l), who continued GH therapy for growth promotion after the attainment of near-FH (height velocity 2.0) at near-FH and incidence of severe GHD in retesting (performed in 62 patients).
RESULTS: Height gain after near-FH was 1.1 ±0.8 cm in boys and 1.0 ±0.8 in girls. Increase of height by 1.0 cm required on average 487 mg of GH (264 injections). IGF-1 concentrations at near-FH were increased in 39 patients, with no clinical side effects. None of the patients retested had GH peak 10.0 µg/l.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no rationale to continue GH therapy in growth promoting doses in the patients with isolated GHD after fulfilling the criteria of near-FH.