Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry · 2025
Evaluation of silver diamine fluoride and biodentine as agents for indirect pulp therapy in primary teeth - A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Srinivasan Daya, Narayan Shoba, Mungara Jayanthi, Shreya S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vital pulp therapy is crucial for preserving primary teeth vitality in deep carious lesions. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and biodentine are emerging materials with promising biological and therapeutic outcomes.
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical, radiographic, and histological outcomes of SDF and biodentine for indirect pulp therapy in primary molars.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This two-phase study included in vivo clinical and radiographic evaluation (Phase 1) and an ex vivo histological assessment (Phase 2). A split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 68 children (4-7 years) with deep carious lesions approaching the pulp in primary molars. A total of 136 teeth were included, forming 68 matched pairs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase 1: Participants were randomly assigned to Group 1 (SDF - Test, n = 68) and Group 2 (Biodentine - Control, n = 68). Following caries excavation, 38% SDF or biodentine was applied. All treated teeth were restored with glass ionomer cement and evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, and 9 months. Phase 2: Teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons were histologically examined for dentin bridge formation, pulpal inflammation, and tissue integrity.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed using SPSS v23.0. Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were applied. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: At 9 months, Group 2 showed higher clinical success (85.3%) than Group 1 (77.9%) (P = 0.035). Radiographic success was greater in Group 2 (83.8%) compared to Group 1 (70.6%) (P = 0.01). Histological findings favored biodentine.
CONCLUSION: Both materials were effective, but biodentine demonstrated superior clinical and biological outcomes.
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical, radiographic, and histological outcomes of SDF and biodentine for indirect pulp therapy in primary molars.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This two-phase study included in vivo clinical and radiographic evaluation (Phase 1) and an ex vivo histological assessment (Phase 2). A split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 68 children (4-7 years) with deep carious lesions approaching the pulp in primary molars. A total of 136 teeth were included, forming 68 matched pairs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase 1: Participants were randomly assigned to Group 1 (SDF - Test, n = 68) and Group 2 (Biodentine - Control, n = 68). Following caries excavation, 38% SDF or biodentine was applied. All treated teeth were restored with glass ionomer cement and evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, and 9 months. Phase 2: Teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons were histologically examined for dentin bridge formation, pulpal inflammation, and tissue integrity.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed using SPSS v23.0. Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were applied. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: At 9 months, Group 2 showed higher clinical success (85.3%) than Group 1 (77.9%) (P = 0.035). Radiographic success was greater in Group 2 (83.8%) compared to Group 1 (70.6%) (P = 0.01). Histological findings favored biodentine.
CONCLUSION: Both materials were effective, but biodentine demonstrated superior clinical and biological outcomes.