DOI 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_185_25
Prevalence of enamel defects in 12-15-year-old children visiting a tertiary care center - A cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Research on the frequency and contributing factors of enamel developmental abnormalities in children in Kerala is scarce. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of enamel defects among 12-15-year-old children in outpatients visiting Government Dental College, Kozhikode, and to correlate their association with prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal factors.
SETTINGS AND
DESIGN
A hospital-based cross-sectional survey among 1110 children aged 12-15 years by a single examiner. Subjects and
Methods
Enamel defects and dental caries were recorded using the Modified developmental defects of enamel (DDE) Index and Decayed, Missed, and Filled teeth Index, respectively. The parents of the children were interviewed with a validated structured questionnaire.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The data analysis was performed using SPSS software 25.0, which included descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and unpaired t-test.
RESULTS
The overall prevalence of DDE was found to be 20.7%, with a significantly higher frequency among male and urban participants. The types of defects were demarcated opacity (9.9%), hypoplastic (4.8%), diffuse (3.1%), demarcated and diffuse (1.4%), demarcated and hypoplastic type (0.8%), diffuse and hypoplastic (0.5%), and the combination of all (0.3%). The association between DDE and the maternal age, low birth weight, premature birth, childhood illness, systemic infection, and traumatic infection to a predecessor was significant.
CONCLUSIONS
There are observable developmental enamel defects in Kerala's Kozhikode region. Several factors were revealed to be strongly linked with those anomalies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.