Neural correlates of rumination in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of fMRI evidence.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Rumination is a transdiagnostic, persistent factor across many psychiatric conditions. Mapping its neural mechanisms may help differentiate ruminative profiles.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review fMRI studies that evaluated rumination in psychiatric populations
METHODS
We searched four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus) and included studies that integrated rumination measures with fMRI data.
RESULTS
Thirty-two articles met criteria; most were non-randomized (n = 31, 97%) and focused on depression (n = 24, 75%). Across disorders, clinical groups showed higher rumination than healthy controls, including in euthymic participants. In major depressive disorder, neural alterations implicated the default mode network, limbic and striatal regions, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex consistent with maladaptive ongoing processing. Neural signatures often persisted in remitted patients, suggesting possible trait markers of vulnerability. Intervention studies (n = 7) support using neuroimaging to track ruminative profiles and to inform more personalized interventions.
CONCLUSION
This review highlights the importance of examining rumination, here measured via trait questionnaires, state-induction paradigms, cognitive tasks, or resting-state fMRI, using more consistent conceptual and methodological approaches. Although rumination is transdiagnostic, implicated brain regions and networks may show disorder-specific patterns. Given heterogeneity in the literature, future work should prioritize controlled and interventional studies to clarify neural mechanisms and guide circuit-based, targeted treatments. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: #CRD532512.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.