Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2018
Association between facial nerve second genu angle and facial canal dehiscence in patients with cholesteatoma: evaluation with temporal multidetector computed tomography and surgical findings.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
TanrivermiŞ Sayit Asli, Gunbey Hediye Pinar, Sağlam Dilek, Gunbey Emre, KardaŞ Şemsettin, Çelenk Çetin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Otitis media, mastoiditis or the pressure effect of tumorous lesions such as cholesteatoma can be the cause of facial canal dehiscence and facial nerve paralysis. The most common segment involved in dehiscence is the tympanic segment and the second most common is the lateral aspect of the facial canal in the oval window area.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of the facial canal dehiscence and the relationship between the angle at the second genu of the facial nerve and facial canal dehiscence.
METHODS: We evaluated the surgical findings in 113 patients who underwent surgery for cholesteatoma. Facial canal dehiscence was detected in 62 of the 113 patients. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, with dehiscence of the facial canal and Group 2, without dehiscence of the facial canal.
RESULTS: The mean angles at the second genu of the facial nerve in Groups 1 and 2 were 117.8°±9.63° and 114°±9.9°, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean angles at the second genu for the two groups (p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: In patients with dehiscence of the facial canal, the angle at the second genu was found to be wider than those without dehiscence.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of the facial canal dehiscence and the relationship between the angle at the second genu of the facial nerve and facial canal dehiscence.
METHODS: We evaluated the surgical findings in 113 patients who underwent surgery for cholesteatoma. Facial canal dehiscence was detected in 62 of the 113 patients. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, with dehiscence of the facial canal and Group 2, without dehiscence of the facial canal.
RESULTS: The mean angles at the second genu of the facial nerve in Groups 1 and 2 were 117.8°±9.63° and 114°±9.9°, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean angles at the second genu for the two groups (p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: In patients with dehiscence of the facial canal, the angle at the second genu was found to be wider than those without dehiscence.