MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10964-011-9657-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of youth and adolescence · 2011

Stress-reactive rumination, negative cognitive style, and stressors in relationship to depressive symptoms in non-clinical youth.

Rood Lea, Roelofs Jeffrey, Bögels Susan M, Meesters Cor

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The role of cognitive vulnerability in the development of depressive symptoms in youth might depend on age and gender. The current study examined cognitive vulnerability models in relationship to depressive symptoms from a developmental perspective. For that purpose, 805 youth (aged 10-18, 59.9% female) completed self-report measures. Stress-reactive rumination was strongly related to depressive symptoms. Negative cognitive style (i.e., tendency to make negative inferences) in the domains of achievement and appearance was more strongly and consistently related to depressive symptoms in girls compared to boys. Negative cognitive style in the interpersonal domain was positively related to depressive symptoms in both girls and boys, except in early adolescent girls reporting few stressors. To conclude, the cognitive vulnerability-stress interaction may be moderated by the combination of age and gender in youth, which may explain inconsistent findings so far. Current findings highlight the importance of taking into account domain specifity when examining models of depression in youth.

Для цитирования: Rood Lea, Roelofs Jeffrey, Bögels Susan M, Meesters Cor. Stress-reactive rumination, negative cognitive style, and stressors in relationship to depressive symptoms in non-clinical youth.. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-011-9657-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.