Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.) · 2011
Patients with atrial fibrillation in a primary care setting: Val-FAAP study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barrios Vivencio, Calderón Alberto, Escobar Carlos, de la Figuera Mariano, Primary Care Group in the Clinical Cardiology Section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation in the primary care setting.
METHODS: This was a 2-phase, cross-sectional, multicenter study: phase A assessed the proportion of atrial fibrillation patients assisted in primary care over 5 days; phase B analyzed atrial fibrillation patients' clinical characteristics and management.
RESULTS: In phase A, 119 526 subjects (age 52.9 [15.2] years; 40.9% male) received primary care in participating centers; 6.1% had atrial fibrillation. This proportion increased with age, hypertension, and male sex. In phase B, we analyzed 3287 atrial fibrillation patients (age 71.9 [10.1] years; 52.3% male). Risk factors were hypertension (92.6%), hypercholesterolemia (70.6%), related cardiovascular disease, heart failure (21.3%), and ischemic heart disease (20.9%). Permanent atrial fibrillation was the most frequent type of atrial fibrillation (45.3%). Age and cardiac and renal diseases were related to permanent atrial fibrillation development. Although more than two-thirds of patients had a CHADS(2) score ≥2, about one-third of them were not taking anticoagulants; by contrast, 46.8% of patients with CHADS(2)=0 were taking oral anticoagulants.
CONCLUSIONS: In primary care, 6.1% of patients had atrial fibrillation. Patients with atrial fibrillation had high comorbidity. Anticoagulant treatment is far from optimal for atrial fibrillation patients in primary care.
METHODS: This was a 2-phase, cross-sectional, multicenter study: phase A assessed the proportion of atrial fibrillation patients assisted in primary care over 5 days; phase B analyzed atrial fibrillation patients' clinical characteristics and management.
RESULTS: In phase A, 119 526 subjects (age 52.9 [15.2] years; 40.9% male) received primary care in participating centers; 6.1% had atrial fibrillation. This proportion increased with age, hypertension, and male sex. In phase B, we analyzed 3287 atrial fibrillation patients (age 71.9 [10.1] years; 52.3% male). Risk factors were hypertension (92.6%), hypercholesterolemia (70.6%), related cardiovascular disease, heart failure (21.3%), and ischemic heart disease (20.9%). Permanent atrial fibrillation was the most frequent type of atrial fibrillation (45.3%). Age and cardiac and renal diseases were related to permanent atrial fibrillation development. Although more than two-thirds of patients had a CHADS(2) score ≥2, about one-third of them were not taking anticoagulants; by contrast, 46.8% of patients with CHADS(2)=0 were taking oral anticoagulants.
CONCLUSIONS: In primary care, 6.1% of patients had atrial fibrillation. Patients with atrial fibrillation had high comorbidity. Anticoagulant treatment is far from optimal for atrial fibrillation patients in primary care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationBlood PressureComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansHypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularMaleMiddle AgedOverweightPrimary Health CareRisk FactorsSex FactorsSpainStrokeYoung Adult