Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
Establishing In Vitro Dosimetric Models and Dose-Effect Relationships for 177Lu-DOTATATE in Neuroendocrine Tumors.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tamborino Giulia, Engbers Pleun, de Wolf Tijmen H, Reuvers Thom G A, Verhagen Rob, Konijnenberg Mark, Nonnekens Julie
Аннотация
This study investigates the radiobiology of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using clinically relevant cancer cell lines by developing a framework for realistic cellular dosimetry in 2- and 3-dimensional cluster-forming configurations. Methods: The radiobiologic responses of GOT1 and NCI-H69 tumor cell lines to PRRT and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) were compared. Viability at 7 d and cell death at multiple time points were assessed. Image-based multicellular dosimetry models were developed to reflect in vitro exposure complexity and were compared with traditional approaches. Results: The PRRT absorbed dose in suspension was dominated by medium during incubation and by a cross-dose within small clusters after incubation. Our findings reveal that traditional dosimetry can underestimate absorbed doses by up to 90% in plated setups and overlooks dose heterogeneity, with initial dose rates varying by up to 2.3-fold based on cluster size and cell arrangement. The maximum relative biologic effectiveness of PRRT compared with EBRT for loss of viability at 7 d was 0.43 ± 0.07 for NCI-H69 cells and 0.22 ± 0.02 for GOT1 cells. NCI-H69 cells showed greater resistance to PRRT-induced cell death than to EBRT, whereas GOT1 cells exhibited similar cell death levels for both treatments, albeit with different dose-response dynamics. Conclusion: PRRT requires on average an absorbed dose 3 times higher than EBRT to achieve equivalent effects in vitro. Traditional dosimetry overestimates the relative biologic effectiveness by underestimating the absorbed dose.