International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
Development and Validation of a Computable Radiation Therapy Phenotype.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Madison Cecelia J, Lynch Julie A, Duvall Scott L, Alba Patrick R, Hanchrow Elizabeth, Agiri Fatai Y, Pridgen Kathryn M, Burri Ryan J, Thompson Reid F, Kelly Maria, Katsoulakis Evangelia
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a robust methodology using structured and semistructured health data to identify patients who have undergone radiation therapy, thereby facilitating future research on treatment outcomes.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified Veterans receiving radiation oncology care through documentation of referrals, encounters, and billing codes from 2014 to 2023. We classified administrative codes based on the process of care and type of radiation received and then analyzed utilization patterns. Unstructured data analysis was performed using keyword search of relevant clinical notes in the metadata fields and categorizing those notes by radiation oncology processes. To validate our algorithm, we compared the cohort we developed using existing data sources to a cohort that was chart reviewed.
RESULTS: The final cohort included 589,318 Veterans with radiation oncology care. Among these, 355,276 Veterans had codes indicating radiation therapy delivery. The most common treatments were image guided radiation therapy, 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy. Anatomy-specific billing codes were underutilized. Clinical note analysis identified 1341 unique labels for radiation oncology content, with 947,928 notes found for 204,064 patients. Validation against chart-reviewed data sets showed strong concordance and confirmed the accuracy of our algorithm in identifying radiation oncology care.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated extraction of medical records can be used to identify cohorts of patients who have undergone radiation therapy. Employing this algorithm may facilitate more precise phenotyping of radiation therapy cases and thus significantly enhance our understanding of these cohorts.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified Veterans receiving radiation oncology care through documentation of referrals, encounters, and billing codes from 2014 to 2023. We classified administrative codes based on the process of care and type of radiation received and then analyzed utilization patterns. Unstructured data analysis was performed using keyword search of relevant clinical notes in the metadata fields and categorizing those notes by radiation oncology processes. To validate our algorithm, we compared the cohort we developed using existing data sources to a cohort that was chart reviewed.
RESULTS: The final cohort included 589,318 Veterans with radiation oncology care. Among these, 355,276 Veterans had codes indicating radiation therapy delivery. The most common treatments were image guided radiation therapy, 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy. Anatomy-specific billing codes were underutilized. Clinical note analysis identified 1341 unique labels for radiation oncology content, with 947,928 notes found for 204,064 patients. Validation against chart-reviewed data sets showed strong concordance and confirmed the accuracy of our algorithm in identifying radiation oncology care.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated extraction of medical records can be used to identify cohorts of patients who have undergone radiation therapy. Employing this algorithm may facilitate more precise phenotyping of radiation therapy cases and thus significantly enhance our understanding of these cohorts.