Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025
Comparative voxel-based dosimetry with pre-treatment Tc-99m SPECT/CT and post-treatment Y-90 PET/MRI for radioembolization with Y-90 microspheres.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Demir Burak, Kucuk Nuriye Ozlem, Soydal Cigdem, Celebioglu Emre Can, Inal Gizem, Dursun Ecenur, Bilgic Mehmet Sadık, Kuru Oz Digdem, Elhan Atilla Halil, Kir Kemal Metin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between voxel-based dosimetry and the mean absorbed doses calculated with pre-treatment Tc-99 m-MAA SPECT/CT and post-treatment Y-90 PET/MR images. We also sought to present a detailed comparison of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) calculated from pre- and post-treatment imaging.
METHODS: A total of 47 treatments and 41 patients were included in the analysis as six of the treatments were retreatments of the six patients. Multicompartment and voxel-based dosimetry were performed with pre-treatment Tc-99m-MAA SPECT/CT and Y-90 PET/MRI. Correlation coefficients between the two imaging methods for the mean absorbed dose of tumor, whole liver normal tissue, perfused normal tissue, T/N ratio and tumor D10, D50 and D90 values were calculated. Additionally, differences between these values were also evaluated with Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: Pre-treatment Tc-99m-MAA SPECT/CT accurately predicted the dose values for healthy liver parenchyma calculated with Y-90 PET/MRI but showed lower accuracy in predicting T/N ratio and tumor doses. There were significant variations in tumor-absorbed doses for both glass and resin microspheres. Additionally, D90 values were higher when calculated with SPECT/CT than with PET/MRI, whereas D10 values were higher in PET/MRI compared to SPECT/CT.
CONCLUSION: The findings in our study suggest that Tc-99m-MAA SPECT/CT had higher accuracy in predicting the dose to the healthy liver parenchyma compared to the tumor, maintaining its importance in treatment planning.
METHODS: A total of 47 treatments and 41 patients were included in the analysis as six of the treatments were retreatments of the six patients. Multicompartment and voxel-based dosimetry were performed with pre-treatment Tc-99m-MAA SPECT/CT and Y-90 PET/MRI. Correlation coefficients between the two imaging methods for the mean absorbed dose of tumor, whole liver normal tissue, perfused normal tissue, T/N ratio and tumor D10, D50 and D90 values were calculated. Additionally, differences between these values were also evaluated with Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: Pre-treatment Tc-99m-MAA SPECT/CT accurately predicted the dose values for healthy liver parenchyma calculated with Y-90 PET/MRI but showed lower accuracy in predicting T/N ratio and tumor doses. There were significant variations in tumor-absorbed doses for both glass and resin microspheres. Additionally, D90 values were higher when calculated with SPECT/CT than with PET/MRI, whereas D10 values were higher in PET/MRI compared to SPECT/CT.
CONCLUSION: The findings in our study suggest that Tc-99m-MAA SPECT/CT had higher accuracy in predicting the dose to the healthy liver parenchyma compared to the tumor, maintaining its importance in treatment planning.