MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska · 2007

Glioblastoma multiforme and meningioma in the same patient - a case report.

Fortuniak Jan, Jaskólski Dariusz J, Zawirski Marek, Tybor Krzysztof

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of diabetic foot syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at 25 centres across eight cities in Pakistan from August 2010 to March 2011, and comprised adult type 2 diabetics. The subjects underwent ankle brachial pressure index evaluation for diabetic foot, and neurological assessment using 10g monofilament for sensation and 128Hz tuning fork to elicit vibration.

RESULTS

Of the 230 subjects, 94(40.86%) were males and 136(59.13%) females. The overall mean age was 53.82±9.96 years and mean glycated haemoglobin was 8.81±2.04%. The prevalence of diabetic foot syndrome was 32(13.9%). Based on established diabetic foot risk classification, 37(16.08%) patients were in category-1, 6(2.60%) in category-2, 32(13.91%) in category-3 and 148(64.34%) in category-0. On ankle brachial pressure index assessment, 94(40.86%) patients had impaired values (p<0.9). Sensation was impaired in 50(21.73%) patients, vibrations could not be detected in 37(16.08%), ankle reflexes could not be elicited in 35(15.21%), and foot pulses could not palpated in 28(12.17%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of diabetic foot syndrome was observed.

Для цитирования: Fortuniak Jan, Jaskólski Dariusz J, Zawirski Marek, Tybor Krzysztof. Glioblastoma multiforme and meningioma in the same patient - a case report.. Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.