MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mph.0000000000001266

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology · 2018

Visual Motor Integration in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.

Newby Robert F, Epping Amanda, Geiger Jennifer A, Miller Meghan S, Scott John Paul

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) demonstrate deficits in cognitive and academic functioning. This study compared the visual motor integration (VMI) skills of children with SCD to non-SCD sibling controls.

PROCEDURE: In total, 105 participants (67 patients with SCD, 38 controls) were recruited during a routine clinic visit. Each participant was administered the Grooved Pegboard Test, a test of manual dexterity and the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of VMI, a measure of graphomotor skills.

RESULTS

Children with SCD demonstrated average (M=89.61, SE=3.08) fine manual dexterity and speed, but more complex fine motor functioning (graphomotor skills) (M=77.61, SE=1.65) was impaired. Relative to healthy siblings, children with SCD were not found to have different fine manual dexterity and speed (P=0.617). Patients with SCD were found to have significantly worse graphomotor skills (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with SCD were found to have average basic fine motor dexterity and speed, but impaired VMI, a more complex fine motor skill. This finding is significant given the functional importance of complex fine motor skills in early academic activities.

Для цитирования: Newby Robert F, Epping Amanda, Geiger Jennifer A, Miller Meghan S, Scott John Paul. Visual Motor Integration in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001266.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.