m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2019

Impact of percutaneous closure device type on vascular and bleeding complications after TAVR: A post hoc analysis from the BRAVO-3 randomized trial.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Power David, Schäfer Ulrich, Guedeney Paul, Claessen Bimmer E, Sartori Samantha, Sorrentino Sabato, Lefèvre Thierry, Kupatt Christian, Tchetche Didier, Dumonteil Nicolas, Webb John G, Colombo Antonio, Windecker Stephen, Ten Berg Jurriën M, Hildick-Smith David, Boekstegers Peter, Linke Axel, Tron Christophe, Van Belle Eric, Asgar Anita W, Jeger Raban, Sardella Gennaro, Hink Ulrich, Husser Oliver, Grube Eberhard, Lechthaler Ilknur, Wijngaard Peter, Anthopoulos Prodromos, Deliargyris Efthymios N, Bernstein Debra, Hengstenberg Christian, Mehran Roxana, Dangas George D

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Prostar XL (PS) and ProGlide (PG) are common vascular closure devices (VCD) used in TAVR via transfemoral vascular approach. The impact of these VCD on vascular and bleeding complications remains unclear.

METHODS: The BRAVO-3 trial randomized 802 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. We stratified patients according to type of VCD used and examined the 30-day incidence of major or minor vascular complications, major bleeding (BARC ≥3b), AKI and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; death, myocardial infarction or stroke).

RESULTS: A total of 746 (93%) patients were treated with either PS (n = 352, 47%) or PG (n = 394, 53%) VCD, without significant differences in successful deployment rate (PS 322 [91.2%] vs. PG 373 [94.2%] respectively, p = .20). PG was associated with a significantly lower incidence of major or minor vascular complications, compared to PS (adjusted OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.37-0.80; p < .01). Rates of acute kidney injury were also lower with the PG device. There was no significant difference between bleeding, MACCE, and death.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PS, the PG VCD was associated with a lower rate of major or minor vascular complications and lower rates of AKI after transfemoral TAVR.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты