Psychiatria polska · 2021
Polish adaptation and validation of the Mentalization Scale (MentS) - a self-report measure of mentalizing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jańczak Monika Olga
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the research was to determine the reliability, factor structure, as well as validity of the Mentalization Scale (MentS) - a self-report measure of mentalization.
METHODS: Two groups of subjects were examined. The first group (N = 202) consisted of students from Poznan universities; the other group (N = 229) consisted of individuals employed in various positions, with different education levels. The following measures were used: Mentalization Questionnaire, the Borderline Personality Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Revised, the short version of the International Personality Item Pool NEO Personality Inventory, short version of Empathy Quotient and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Reliability analysis showed high internal consistency of all three MentS subscales, and the factor analysis supports the three-factor structure of the questionnaire. Mentalization as measured by MentS was positively linked with mentalization-related constructs: empathy and emotional intelligence. Obtained relations between mentalization and attachment dimensions, borderline features and personality traits as well as observed gender differences also support the validity of the MentS.
CONCLUSIONS: The verification of the hypotheses formulated in the present study has led to the conclusion that the Polish version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS) - a new measure of mentalization - has high psychometric value and may be used for brief yet multifaceted measurement of mentalization.
METHODS: Two groups of subjects were examined. The first group (N = 202) consisted of students from Poznan universities; the other group (N = 229) consisted of individuals employed in various positions, with different education levels. The following measures were used: Mentalization Questionnaire, the Borderline Personality Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Revised, the short version of the International Personality Item Pool NEO Personality Inventory, short version of Empathy Quotient and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Reliability analysis showed high internal consistency of all three MentS subscales, and the factor analysis supports the three-factor structure of the questionnaire. Mentalization as measured by MentS was positively linked with mentalization-related constructs: empathy and emotional intelligence. Obtained relations between mentalization and attachment dimensions, borderline features and personality traits as well as observed gender differences also support the validity of the MentS.
CONCLUSIONS: The verification of the hypotheses formulated in the present study has led to the conclusion that the Polish version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS) - a new measure of mentalization - has high psychometric value and may be used for brief yet multifaceted measurement of mentalization.