Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2017
Modified balloon aortic valvuloplasty in fragile symptomatic patients unsuitable for both surgical and percutaneous valve replacement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rigatelli Gianluca, Dell'Avvocata Fabio, Conte Luca, Lanza Daniela, Giatti Sara, Del Santo Pierluigi, Roncon Loris, Faggian Giuseppe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Balloon Aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is considered as a bridge therapy to percutaneous valve implantation or a palliative treatment in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AVS). Potential risk of complications, in particular in fragile patients, is still not negligible.
AIM: To describe the technique and outcomes of modified BAV in fragile symptomatic patients unsuitable for other treatments using no-pacing and minimally invasive approach.
METHODS: Symptomatic fragile patients with severe aortic valve stenosis judged unsuitable by the heart team for surgical or percutaneous valve implantation from 1 September 2013 to 1 September 2017 were offered modified BAV. Simplified procedural protocol included a 4F right radial artery access for gradient check, a 8F compatible undersized balloons, two partial inflations-trial before a full inflation with no-pace maker back-up, final pressure gradient recording and aortography.
RESULTS: Thirty-four symptomatic fragile patients (mean age 80.9±4.9, range 73 to 91years, 100% Katz >6, mean Euroscore I 30.0±11.7%) underwent modified BAV in the last 5years with immediate success in all (100%). Mean aortic valve area increased from 0.58±0.2cm2 to 1.1±0.2cm2 (p<0.01) whereas mean peak gradient decreased from 75.6±11.3 to 35.8±11.2mmHg (p<0.01). Procedural complications were 14.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 11.8%. On a mean follow up of 38.4±4.6months four patients successfully repeated the procedure, while global mortality was 23.5% (8 patients). The other 22 patients maintained a NYHA class of 2.1±0.7.
CONCLUSIONS: No-pacing minimally invasive BAV seems to have acceptable outcomes in patients with severe AVS and no other treatment options.
AIM: To describe the technique and outcomes of modified BAV in fragile symptomatic patients unsuitable for other treatments using no-pacing and minimally invasive approach.
METHODS: Symptomatic fragile patients with severe aortic valve stenosis judged unsuitable by the heart team for surgical or percutaneous valve implantation from 1 September 2013 to 1 September 2017 were offered modified BAV. Simplified procedural protocol included a 4F right radial artery access for gradient check, a 8F compatible undersized balloons, two partial inflations-trial before a full inflation with no-pace maker back-up, final pressure gradient recording and aortography.
RESULTS: Thirty-four symptomatic fragile patients (mean age 80.9±4.9, range 73 to 91years, 100% Katz >6, mean Euroscore I 30.0±11.7%) underwent modified BAV in the last 5years with immediate success in all (100%). Mean aortic valve area increased from 0.58±0.2cm2 to 1.1±0.2cm2 (p<0.01) whereas mean peak gradient decreased from 75.6±11.3 to 35.8±11.2mmHg (p<0.01). Procedural complications were 14.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 11.8%. On a mean follow up of 38.4±4.6months four patients successfully repeated the procedure, while global mortality was 23.5% (8 patients). The other 22 patients maintained a NYHA class of 2.1±0.7.
CONCLUSIONS: No-pacing minimally invasive BAV seems to have acceptable outcomes in patients with severe AVS and no other treatment options.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBalloon ValvuloplastyContraindications, ProcedureFemaleFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHemodynamicsHumansMaleRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment Outcome