DOI 10.1016/j.psym.2012.05.007
The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory as a screening test for psychiatric comorbidity in patients with tinnitus.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Psychiatric comorbidity is common in patients who seek help for tinnitus. The perceived severity of tinnitus correlates closer to psychological and general health factors than to audiometrical parameters. Audiologists need valid screening tools in order to identify patients with psychiatric disorders and to tailor treatment in a multidisciplinary setting. The tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) has gained widespread acceptance as a self-report measure of tinnitus handicap. In several studies, THI test score correlates with the level of psychopathologic distress. The aim of our study was to investigate the predictive power of the test THI in relation to psychiatric disorders.
METHODS
We recruited 156 patients with chronic tinnitus who have requested help at our tinnitus center. All patients underwent psychiatric evaluation, the diagnosis was made in agreement with the DSMIV-TR criteria; all patients filled out the following questionnaires: THI, Symptomatic Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) and Stress-related Vulnerability Scale (VRS). Sensibility and specificity of tests as screening tool for psychiatric disorders was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS
Sixty-eight patients (prevalence: 43.59%) were found to be affected by a psychiatric disorder. AUC = 0.792 (p > 0.001) shows that THI is a moderately accurate test to individuate psychiatric affected people among our sample. We identified a score of 36 at THI (sensibility = 86.76%; specificity = 59.09%) as an appropriate cut-off point.
CONCLUSIONS
If a patient reports a THI score greater than 36, the audiologist should supplement diagnostic studies with a psychiatric evaluation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.