European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
Validity and reliability of the total rating of eye, nasal, and dry-mouth (TREND) score.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lechien Jérôme R, Chiesa-Estomba Carlos M, Mayo-Yanez Miguel, Iannella Giannicola, Barillari Maria R, Guarino Pierre, Lazzeroni Matteo, Saibene Alberto M, Cammaroto Giovanni, Salzano Giovanni, Andrianakis Alexandrios, Hemptinne Coralie, Saussez Sven, Maniaci Antonino, Vaira Luigi A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the total rating of eye, nasal, and dry-mouth (TREND) score, which is a patient-reported outcome measure of upper aerodigestive tract mucosa dryness. METHOD: Patients with dry symptoms and findings of mouth, laryngopharynx, nose, and eyes were prospectively recruited between June 2024 to November 2025. Patients and healthy individuals completed TREND score within a 7-day period to assess test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s α for TREND items and sub- and total scores in patients and controls. For patients with dry vocal fold or reflux-related dry throat, validity was evaluated by comparing the TREND with the reflux symptom score (RSS) and the voice handicap index (VHI). Dry findings were collected. Pre-to posttreatment evolution of TREND was assessed to evaluate the responsiveness to change. RESULTS: A total of 164 consecutive patients with dry mucosa complaints completed evaluations (106 females), alongside 85 controls (44 females). Mean TREND sub-/total scores were significantly higher in patients versus controls, demonstrating adequate discriminant validity. External validity showed moderate-to-strong correlations between TREND and RSS in LPRD patients (rs=0.650;95%CI: 0.535–0.742;p = 0.001) and between TREND and VHI in hoarseness patients (rs=0.437;95%CI: 0.234–0.603;p = 0.001). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.856), with moderate-to-high test-retest reliability. ROC analysis suggested a TREND > 19 as pathological threshold in this population (AUC = 0.837;sensitivity:83.5%,specificity:54.8%; Youden index:0.383). CONCLUSION: TREND score is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome questionnaire documenting dry throat, mouth, nose, and eye symptoms in otolaryngology. Future studies are needed to establish psychometric properties of TREND in several other dry disorders.