MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pec.0000000000003020

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric emergency care · 2023

Pharmacologic Procedural Distress Management During Laceration Repair in Children: A Systematic Review.

Siu Annisa, Tran Nam-Anh, Ali Samina, Coyle Doug, Mahood Quenby, Marks Yanara, Pechlivanoglou Petros, Poonai Naveen, Heath Anna

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To systematically appraise the literature on the relative effectiveness of pharmacologic procedural distress management agents for children undergoing laceration repair.

METHODS

Six databases were searched in August 2021, and the search was updated in January 2023. We included completed randomized or quasi-randomized trials involving ( a ) children younger than 15 years undergoing laceration repair in the emergency department; ( b ) randomization to at least one anxiolytic, sedative, and/or analgesic agent versus any comparator agent or placebo; ( c ) efficacy of procedural distress management measured on any scale. Secondary outcomes were pain during the procedure, administration acceptance, sedation duration, additional sedation, length of stay, and stakeholder satisfaction. Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool assessed individual studies. Ranges and proportions summarized results where applicable.

RESULTS

Among 21 trials (n = 1621 participants), the most commonly studied anxiolytic agents were midazolam, ketamine, and N 2 O. Oral midazolam, oral ketamine, and N 2 O were found to reduce procedural distress more effectively than their comparators in 4, 3, and 2 studies, respectively. Eight studies comparing routes, doses, or volumes of administration of the same agent led to indeterminate results. Meta-analysis was not performed because of heterogeneity in comparators, routes, and outcome measures across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on procedural distress reduction, this study favors oral midazolam and oral ketamine. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution because of heterogeneous comparators across studies and minor conflicting results. An optimal agent for procedural distress management cannot be recommended based on the limited evidence. Future research should seek to identify the minimal, essential measures of patient distress during pharmacologic anxiolysis and/or sedation in laceration repair to guide future trials and reviews.

Для цитирования: Siu Annisa, Tran Nam-Anh, Ali Samina, Coyle Doug, Mahood Quenby, Marks Yanara, Pechlivanoglou Petros, Poonai Naveen, Heath Anna. Pharmacologic Procedural Distress Management During Laceration Repair in Children: A Systematic Review.. Pediatric emergency care. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000003020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.