Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2020
Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Edoxaban Therapy Versus Vitamin K Antagonists: a Real-world Propensity Score-Matched Study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rago Anna, Papa Andrea Antonio, Attena Emilio, Parisi Valentina, Golino Paolo, Nigro Gerardo, Russo Vincenzo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term effectiveness and safety of newly initiated anticoagulation with edoxaban (EDO) versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)-guided direct electrical current cardioversion (DCC).
METHODS: A propensity score-matched cohort observational study was performed comparing the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban versus well-controlled VKA therapy among a cohort of consecutive non-valvular AF patients scheduled for DCC. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE).
FINDINGS: A total of 130 AF patients receiving edoxaban 60-mg (EDO) treatment were compared with the same number of VKA recipients. The cumulative incidence of major bleedings was 1.54% in the EDO group and 3.08% in the VKA group (P = 0.4). The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 1.54% in the EDO group and 2.31% in the VKA group (P = 0.9). A non-significant trend in improved adherence was observed between the EDO and VKA groups with a total anticoagulant therapy discontinuation rate of 4.62% (6/130) vs 6.15% (8/130), respectively (P = 0.06).
IMPLICATIONS: Our study provides the evidence of a safe and effective use of edoxaban in this clinical setting, justified by no significant difference in major bleedings and thromboembolic events between edoxaban and well-controlled VKA treatments.
METHODS: A propensity score-matched cohort observational study was performed comparing the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban versus well-controlled VKA therapy among a cohort of consecutive non-valvular AF patients scheduled for DCC. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE).
FINDINGS: A total of 130 AF patients receiving edoxaban 60-mg (EDO) treatment were compared with the same number of VKA recipients. The cumulative incidence of major bleedings was 1.54% in the EDO group and 3.08% in the VKA group (P = 0.4). The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 1.54% in the EDO group and 2.31% in the VKA group (P = 0.9). A non-significant trend in improved adherence was observed between the EDO and VKA groups with a total anticoagulant therapy discontinuation rate of 4.62% (6/130) vs 6.15% (8/130), respectively (P = 0.06).
IMPLICATIONS: Our study provides the evidence of a safe and effective use of edoxaban in this clinical setting, justified by no significant difference in major bleedings and thromboembolic events between edoxaban and well-controlled VKA treatments.