The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2011
Study of parasite kinetics with antileishmanial drugs using real-time quantitative PCR in Indian visceral leishmaniasis.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sudarshan Medhavi, Weirather Jason L, Wilson Mary E, Sundar Shyam
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study describes parasite kinetics in the blood of visceral leishmaniasis patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) or a preformed fat emulsion of amphotericin B (ApL) using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR).
METHODS: Forty-six patients were treated with a single dose (15 mg/kg of body weight) of either L-AmB (n = 13) or ApL (n = 33). qPCR was used to estimate parasite kinetics by detection of Leishmania donovani DNA using kinetoplast DNA-specific primers in peripheral blood samples using an absolute quantification method.
RESULTS: The mean parasite load decreased from baseline (day 0) values of 894.07 and 980.48 to 71.72 and 211.52 parasite genomes/mL at day 7 in L-AmB and ApL groups, respectively, and at day 30 these further declined to 8.30 and 133.98 parasite genomes/mL, respectively. At day 30 post-treatment evaluation, the decline in parasite load was significantly greater (P = 0.024) with L-AmB compared with ApL. Four of 33 patients in the ApL group failed treatment (1 primary failure and 3 relapses) with the presence of parasites, whereas all patients in the L-AmB group were cured at 6 month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: qPCR can be a tool to measure parasite dynamics accurately and provide a marker to measure the efficacy of various drugs. It can be used as a test of cure, allowing us to do away with invasive and risky methods such as splenic or bone marrow aspiration.
METHODS: Forty-six patients were treated with a single dose (15 mg/kg of body weight) of either L-AmB (n = 13) or ApL (n = 33). qPCR was used to estimate parasite kinetics by detection of Leishmania donovani DNA using kinetoplast DNA-specific primers in peripheral blood samples using an absolute quantification method.
RESULTS: The mean parasite load decreased from baseline (day 0) values of 894.07 and 980.48 to 71.72 and 211.52 parasite genomes/mL at day 7 in L-AmB and ApL groups, respectively, and at day 30 these further declined to 8.30 and 133.98 parasite genomes/mL, respectively. At day 30 post-treatment evaluation, the decline in parasite load was significantly greater (P = 0.024) with L-AmB compared with ApL. Four of 33 patients in the ApL group failed treatment (1 primary failure and 3 relapses) with the presence of parasites, whereas all patients in the L-AmB group were cured at 6 month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: qPCR can be a tool to measure parasite dynamics accurately and provide a marker to measure the efficacy of various drugs. It can be used as a test of cure, allowing us to do away with invasive and risky methods such as splenic or bone marrow aspiration.