MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/deafed/enx023

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2017

Computerized Sign Language-Based Literacy Training for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.

Holmer Emil, Heimann Mikael, Rudner Mary

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Strengthening the connections between sign language and written language may improve reading skills in deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) signing children. The main aim of the present study was to investigate whether computerized sign language-based literacy training improves reading skills in DHH signing children who are learning to read. Further, longitudinal associations between sign language skills and developing reading skills were investigated. Participants were recruited from Swedish state special schools for DHH children, where pupils are taught in both sign language and spoken language. Reading skills were assessed at five occasions and the intervention was implemented in a cross-over design. Results indicated that reading skills improved over time and that development of word reading was predicted by the ability to imitate unfamiliar lexical signs, but there was only weak evidence that it was supported by the intervention. These results demonstrate for the first time a longitudinal link between sign-based abilities and word reading in DHH signing children who are learning to read. We suggest that the active construction of novel lexical forms may be a supramodal mechanism underlying word reading development.

Для цитирования: Holmer Emil, Heimann Mikael, Rudner Mary. Computerized Sign Language-Based Literacy Training for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education. 2017. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enx023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.