European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kostadinov Filip, Schlegel-Wagner Christoph, Linder Thomas
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surgical procedure for each patient.
METHODS: Using the "ChOLE" classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes.
RESULTS: Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b & 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 & 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in postoperative mean air-bone gap (ABG) between CWU (17dB) and CWD (27dB).
CONCLUSION: The main goals of cholesteatoma surgery remain the avoidance of recidivism and optimal hearing rehabilitation. We recommend a tailored approach in the treatment of cholesteatomas and not a dogmatic one. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform a CWD procedure if required. Performed correctly it results in a dry ear and CWD surgery should remain in the skill set of the otologic surgeon.
METHODS: Using the "ChOLE" classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes.
RESULTS: Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b & 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 & 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in postoperative mean air-bone gap (ABG) between CWU (17dB) and CWD (27dB).
CONCLUSION: The main goals of cholesteatoma surgery remain the avoidance of recidivism and optimal hearing rehabilitation. We recommend a tailored approach in the treatment of cholesteatomas and not a dogmatic one. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform a CWD procedure if required. Performed correctly it results in a dry ear and CWD surgery should remain in the skill set of the otologic surgeon.