MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jocs.12092

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiac surgery · 2013

Stand alone surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Abo-Salem Elsayed, Paone Ralph F, Nugent Kenneth, Perez-Verdia Alejandro, Deshpande Alok, Amiri Hoda Mojazi

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Trials to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and refractory symptoms have been complicated by lack of success or intolerance of medications. Experience with minimally invasive AF surgery is relatively new, and early results have been promising. However, the study populations and techniques were heterogeneous, and the follow-up periods were short in many series.

METHODS

We present a single center experience through a retrospective review of medical records of patients who had minimally invasive AF surgery.

RESULTS

The surgical techniques addressed several possible mechanisms of AF and causes of recurrence, including pulmonary vein isolation, underlying substrates modification, ligament of Marshall interruption, ganglion plexus ablation, and left atrial appendage exclusion. Thirty-three cases were identified. The mean duration of follow-up was 23.2 months, and 58.6% were maintained in a sinus rhythm and were off antiarrhythmic drugs at the end of the follow-up period. Cases with persistent AF had a lower success rate.

CONCLUSION

Results with minimally invasive surgery are suboptimal at two years of follow-up, particularly for patients with persistent AF.

Для цитирования: Abo-Salem Elsayed, Paone Ralph F, Nugent Kenneth, Perez-Verdia Alejandro, Deshpande Alok, Amiri Hoda Mojazi. Stand alone surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.. Journal of cardiac surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/jocs.12092.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.