MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.07.005

Медицинская библиотека · Seizure · 2015

Diagnostic criteria currently proposed for "ictal epileptic headache": Perspectives on strengths, weaknesses and pitfalls.

Parisi Pasquale, Verrotti Alberto, Costa Paola, Striano Pasquale, Zanus Caterina, Carrozzi Marco, Raucci Umberto, Villa Maria Pia, Belcastro Vincenzo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: When we published the diagnostic criteria for "ictal epileptic headache" in 2012, we deliberately and consciously chose to adopt restrictive criteria that probably underestimate the phenomenon, rather than spread panic among patients and physicians who are reluctant to accept this entity.

METHODS

Here we discuss four intriguing clinical cases to highlight why we believe, to this day, that it is necessary to follow these restrictive diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG is not recommended as a routine examination for children diagnosed with headache, but it is mandatory and must be carried out promptly in cases of prolonged headache that does not respond to antimigraine drugs, if epilepsy is suspected or has been diagnosed previously. This is not a marginal or irrelevant question because possible isolated, non-motor, ictal manifestations should be taken into account before declaring that an epileptic patient is "seizure free" so as to ensure that any decision taken to suspend anticonvulsant therapy is safe.

Для цитирования: Parisi Pasquale, Verrotti Alberto, Costa Paola, Striano Pasquale, Zanus Caterina, Carrozzi Marco, Raucci Umberto, Villa Maria Pia, Belcastro Vincenzo. Diagnostic criteria currently proposed for "ictal epileptic headache": Perspectives on strengths, weaknesses and pitfalls.. Seizure. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.07.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.