Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2021
Long-term hard and soft tissue response following isolated genioplasty: a systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
George Jaymi Anna, Kannan Annapurna, Kailasam Vignesh
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Genioplasty facilitates alteration of the chin position and contour which contributes to aesthetics and function. The response of the hard and soft tissues following genioplasty has not been assessed after a year or more of the surgery being performed. Hence, the aim of this systematic review was to assess the response of the hard and soft tissues occurring at least 1 year after the procedure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Ovid, LILACS, and Cochrane Library. Potential articles were identified wherein only studies with genioplasty performed as an isolated procedure and with data at least 12 months after the procedure were included.
RESULTS: Five studies were included in this systematic review. Two of the articles included were considered to be of good quality while three were considered to be of moderate quality using a modified Downs and Black tool. The ROBINS-I tool showed a moderate risk of bias for most domains. The study characteristics revealed varying degrees of relapse for the hard and soft tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: In the anteroposterior plane, the soft tissue relapsed more than the hard tissues 3 years post genioplasty. However, relapse in the vertical plane showed a wide variation for both the hard and soft tissues. In the anteroposterior plane, the hard tissue to soft tissue response 2 years or more following genioplasty ranged from 1:0.77 to 1:0.91 while in the vertical plane the hard tissue to soft tissue response ranged from 1:0.67 to 1:1.16.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Ovid, LILACS, and Cochrane Library. Potential articles were identified wherein only studies with genioplasty performed as an isolated procedure and with data at least 12 months after the procedure were included.
RESULTS: Five studies were included in this systematic review. Two of the articles included were considered to be of good quality while three were considered to be of moderate quality using a modified Downs and Black tool. The ROBINS-I tool showed a moderate risk of bias for most domains. The study characteristics revealed varying degrees of relapse for the hard and soft tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: In the anteroposterior plane, the soft tissue relapsed more than the hard tissues 3 years post genioplasty. However, relapse in the vertical plane showed a wide variation for both the hard and soft tissues. In the anteroposterior plane, the hard tissue to soft tissue response 2 years or more following genioplasty ranged from 1:0.77 to 1:0.91 while in the vertical plane the hard tissue to soft tissue response ranged from 1:0.67 to 1:1.16.