MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.021

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2004

Lower incidence rates but thicker melanomas in Eastern Europe before 1992: a comparison with Western Europe.

de Vries E, Boniol M, Doré J F, Coebergh J W W, EUROCARE working group

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The objective of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of melanoma across Europe with regard to Breslow thickness and body-site distribution. Incidence data from Cancer Incidence in 5 Continents and the EUROCARE-melanoma database were used: 28?117 melanoma cases from 20 cancer registries in 12 European countries, diagnosed between 1978 and 1992. Regression analysis and general linear modelling were used to analyse the data. Melanomas in Eastern Europe were on average 1.4 mm thicker (P<0.05) than in Western Europe and appeared more often on the trunk. From 1978 to 1992, their Breslow thickness had decreased in Western but not Eastern Europe. There was a latitude gradient in incidence, with highest rates in southern regions in Eastern Europe and an inverse gradient in Western Europe, with highest rates in the North. Mortality:incidence ratios were less favourable in southern parts across Europe, especially in Eastern Europe. If Eastern European populations copy the sunbathing behaviour of the West it is likely that in the near future a higher melanoma incidence can be expected there.

Для цитирования: de Vries E, Boniol M, Doré J F, Coebergh J W W, EUROCARE working group. Lower incidence rates but thicker melanomas in Eastern Europe before 1992: a comparison with Western Europe.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.