Hepatology international · 2024
Liver and cardiovascular outcomes in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of about 1 million individuals.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Souza Matheus, Diaz Ivanna, Al-Sharif Lubna
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in lean people. However, the magnitude of the prognostic hepatic and cardiovascular risk in these patients compared to non-lean counterparts remains unclear. We aimed to investigate this topic, and to explore whether these risks change based on factors related to NAFLD severity.
METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies (published through April 2024) that evaluated liver and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD and reported unadjusted or adjusted data. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) using a random-effects modeling and performed subgroup and meta-regressions analyses.
RESULTS: We identified 22 studies with over 1 million NAFLD patients (13.0% were lean). Lean NAFLD showed a similar risk of liver-related events in unadjusted analysis (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.49, I2 = 31%), but a higher risk in adjusted analysis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.36, I2 = 83%) compared to non-lean NAFLD. Lean NAFLD had a higher risk of liver-related mortality (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.57-3.15, I2 = 0%; HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.14-4.51, I2 = 0%). For CV outcomes, lean NAFLD had a lower risk of any cardiovascular disease in unadjusted analysis (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95, I2 = 88%), but similar risk in adjusted analysis (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.02, I2 = 78%), and similar risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66, I2 = 85%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78, I2 = 46%) compared to non-lean NAFLD.
CONCLUSIONS: Lean NAFLD patients have worse liver outcomes, but similar CV outcomes compared to non-lean NAFLD patients, highlighting the importance of monitoring both groups closely.
METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies (published through April 2024) that evaluated liver and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD and reported unadjusted or adjusted data. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) using a random-effects modeling and performed subgroup and meta-regressions analyses.
RESULTS: We identified 22 studies with over 1 million NAFLD patients (13.0% were lean). Lean NAFLD showed a similar risk of liver-related events in unadjusted analysis (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.49, I2 = 31%), but a higher risk in adjusted analysis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.36, I2 = 83%) compared to non-lean NAFLD. Lean NAFLD had a higher risk of liver-related mortality (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.57-3.15, I2 = 0%; HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.14-4.51, I2 = 0%). For CV outcomes, lean NAFLD had a lower risk of any cardiovascular disease in unadjusted analysis (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95, I2 = 88%), but similar risk in adjusted analysis (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.02, I2 = 78%), and similar risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66, I2 = 85%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78, I2 = 46%) compared to non-lean NAFLD.
CONCLUSIONS: Lean NAFLD patients have worse liver outcomes, but similar CV outcomes compared to non-lean NAFLD patients, highlighting the importance of monitoring both groups closely.