Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2011
Prevalence and prognosis of myocardial scar in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and normal wall motion.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krittayaphong Rungroj, Saiviroonporn Pairash, Boonyasirinant Thananya, Udompunturak Suthipol
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Some patients may have normal wall motion after myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and prognosis of patients with myocardial scar in the absence of abnormal wall motion. We studied patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) who were referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the assessment of global and regional cardiac function and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and had normal left ventricular wall motion. Prognostic value was determined by the occurrence of hard endpoints (cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which also included hospitalization due to unstable angina or heart failure or life threatening ventricular arrhythmia.
RESULTS: A total 1148 patients (70.3%) were studied. LGE was detected in 104 patients (9.1%). Prevalence of LGE increased in patients with increased left ventricular mass. Average follow-up time was 955 ± 542 days. LGE was the strongest predictor for hard endpoints and MACE.
CONCLUSION: LGE was detected in 9.1% of patients with suspected or known CAD and normal wall motion. LGE was the strongest predictor of significant cardiac events.
RESULTS: A total 1148 patients (70.3%) were studied. LGE was detected in 104 patients (9.1%). Prevalence of LGE increased in patients with increased left ventricular mass. Average follow-up time was 955 ± 542 days. LGE was the strongest predictor for hard endpoints and MACE.
CONCLUSION: LGE was detected in 9.1% of patients with suspected or known CAD and normal wall motion. LGE was the strongest predictor of significant cardiac events.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedChi-Square DistributionCicatrixCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleGadoliniumHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRadiographic Image EnhancementReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurvival RateVentricular Function, Left