Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025
Effect of Overweight and Obesity on the Response to Anti-TNF Therapy and Disease Course in Children With IBD.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sila Sara, Aloi Marina, Cucinotta Ugo, Gianolio Laura, Granot Maya, Hradsky Ondrej, Hussey Séamus, Kang Ben, Karoliny Anna, Kolho Kaija-Leena, de Laffolie Jan, Lega Sara, Matar Manar, Norsa Lorenzo, Omiwole Sharon, Orlanski-Meyer Esther, Palomino Laura, Rohani Pejman, Scarallo Luca, Sladek Margaret, Sohouli Mohammad Hassan, Urlep Darja, Yerushalmy-Feler Anat, Zifman Eyal, Hojsak Iva
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of overweight and obesity at the start of anti-TNF therapy on treatment response and relapse rate in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 22 IBD centers in 14 countries. Children diagnosed with IBD in whom antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) was introduced were included; those who were overweight/obese were compared with children who were well/undernourished.
RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-seven children (370 [58%] males; mean age 11.5 ± 3.5 years) were included; 140 (22%) were in the overweight/obese group (OG) and 497 (78%) had BMI ≤1 SD (CG). The mean follow-up time was 141 ± 78 weeks (median 117 weeks). There was no difference in the loss of response (LOR) to anti-TNF between groups throughout the follow-up. However, children in OG had more dose escalations than controls. Male sex and lack of concomitant immunomodulators at the start of anti-TNF were risk factors associated with the LOR. There was no difference in the relapse rate in the first year after anti-TNF introduction; however, at the end of the follow-up, the relapse rate was significantly higher in the OG compared with CG (89 [64%] vs 218 [44%], respectively, P < .001). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that being overweight/obese, having UC, or being of male sex were factors associated with a higher risk for relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: Overweight/obese children with IBD were not at a higher risk of LOR to anti-TNF. Relapse in the first year after anti-TNF was introduced, but risk for relapse was increased at the end of follow-up.
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 22 IBD centers in 14 countries. Children diagnosed with IBD in whom antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) was introduced were included; those who were overweight/obese were compared with children who were well/undernourished.
RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-seven children (370 [58%] males; mean age 11.5 ± 3.5 years) were included; 140 (22%) were in the overweight/obese group (OG) and 497 (78%) had BMI ≤1 SD (CG). The mean follow-up time was 141 ± 78 weeks (median 117 weeks). There was no difference in the loss of response (LOR) to anti-TNF between groups throughout the follow-up. However, children in OG had more dose escalations than controls. Male sex and lack of concomitant immunomodulators at the start of anti-TNF were risk factors associated with the LOR. There was no difference in the relapse rate in the first year after anti-TNF introduction; however, at the end of the follow-up, the relapse rate was significantly higher in the OG compared with CG (89 [64%] vs 218 [44%], respectively, P < .001). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that being overweight/obese, having UC, or being of male sex were factors associated with a higher risk for relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: Overweight/obese children with IBD were not at a higher risk of LOR to anti-TNF. Relapse in the first year after anti-TNF was introduced, but risk for relapse was increased at the end of follow-up.