Asian journal of psychiatry · 2018
Neuro-hemodynamic endophenotypes of emotional interference in OCD: fMRI study using emotion counting stroop task.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Narayanaswamy Janardhanan C, Jose Dania, Agarwal Sri Mahavir, Kalmady Sunil V, Baruah Upasana, Shivakumar Venkataram, Prasad Chandrajit, Viswanath Biju, Rao Naren P, Venkatasubramanian Ganesan, Janardhan Reddy Y C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the endophenotype pattern of neuro-hemodynamic substrates of emotion counting Stroop (ecStroop) paradigm in patients with OCD, their unaffected siblings [first degree relatives-FDR] and healthy controls (HC).
METHODS: OCD patients (medication naïve)[N = 16], their unaffected siblings(FDR)[N = 16] and HC [N = 24] were compared using an established ecStroop paradigm in a 3-Tesla fMRI. The relative BOLD signals corresponding to the three types of conditions (neural words-N, words with negative emotional salience-E and words with salience for OCD-O) were examined in the apriori hypothesized brain regions.
RESULTS: Both in O minus N contrast and O minus E contrast, the groups demonstrated significant differential activation of right insula (BA 13). The post-hoc analyses showed in patients and FDRs relative to HC the following: significant hyperactivation of insula in O minus E contrast; significant hyperactivation of right insula and right DLPFC (BA 9) in O minus N contrast.
CONCLUSIONS: The neuro-hemodynamic responses corresponding to the obsessive words in insula and DLPFC could be potential endophenotypes. "Threat relatedness" might thus have a vulnerability meaning in the pathogenesis and neurobiological basis of OCD.
METHODS: OCD patients (medication naïve)[N = 16], their unaffected siblings(FDR)[N = 16] and HC [N = 24] were compared using an established ecStroop paradigm in a 3-Tesla fMRI. The relative BOLD signals corresponding to the three types of conditions (neural words-N, words with negative emotional salience-E and words with salience for OCD-O) were examined in the apriori hypothesized brain regions.
RESULTS: Both in O minus N contrast and O minus E contrast, the groups demonstrated significant differential activation of right insula (BA 13). The post-hoc analyses showed in patients and FDRs relative to HC the following: significant hyperactivation of insula in O minus E contrast; significant hyperactivation of right insula and right DLPFC (BA 9) in O minus N contrast.
CONCLUSIONS: The neuro-hemodynamic responses corresponding to the obsessive words in insula and DLPFC could be potential endophenotypes. "Threat relatedness" might thus have a vulnerability meaning in the pathogenesis and neurobiological basis of OCD.