The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2026
Operative benefits of embolisation in advanced-stage juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: a meta-analytic comparison.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Segal Aviv Yvonne, Hijazi Basem, Ronen Ohad
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma is a highly vascular benign tumour affecting adolescent males. Our aim was to compare operative outcomes in embolised and non-embolised patients, with emphasis on tumour stage.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS: Overall, 17 studies with a total of 524 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference in estimated blood loss between embolised and non-embolised groups (overall effect size -685 ml; p < 0.001). Additionally, embolised patients with advanced stage tumours tended to lose less blood during surgery than non-embolised patients (mean of 1551.9 ml vs. 4051.5 ml; p = 0.065).
CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that pre-operative endovascular embolisation provides an operative advantage in patients undergoing juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma surgical resection. A near-significant trend towards greater benefit in higher-stage tumours was observed (p = 0.065), warranting further prospective investigation.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS: Overall, 17 studies with a total of 524 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference in estimated blood loss between embolised and non-embolised groups (overall effect size -685 ml; p < 0.001). Additionally, embolised patients with advanced stage tumours tended to lose less blood during surgery than non-embolised patients (mean of 1551.9 ml vs. 4051.5 ml; p = 0.065).
CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that pre-operative endovascular embolisation provides an operative advantage in patients undergoing juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma surgical resection. A near-significant trend towards greater benefit in higher-stage tumours was observed (p = 0.065), warranting further prospective investigation.