MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/00034894221133768

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022

Managing the Destructive Foreign Body: Water Beads in the Ear (A Case Series) and Literature Review.

Zalzal Habib G, Ryan Matthew, Reilly Brian, Mudd Pamela

ОбзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To characterize our experience with super-absorbent polymer beads placed in the external auditory canal to better understand the damage caused and subsequent management required.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients at 2 separate tertiary referral centers.

RESULTS

Seven patients were identified as having placed super-absorbent polymer beads in the external auditory canal, 6 of whom required removal under general anesthesia. Three patients did not suffer otologic trauma or hearing loss (average foreign body duration <72 hours). Four patients experienced severe otologic complications (average foreign body duration >1 week), all of whom were treated with otologic drops prior to bead identification. Of this severe complication group, 3 patients had restored hearing after surgical intervention, while 1 patient suffered profound hearing loss secondary to labyrinthitis ossificans.

CONCLUSION

Early recognition of otologic foreign bodies is important, particularly if expansile water-bead is suspected. Depending on timeframe, water beads are highly destructive to the middle ear structures, and most patients will require surgical intervention.

Для цитирования: Zalzal Habib G, Ryan Matthew, Reilly Brian, Mudd Pamela. Managing the Destructive Foreign Body: Water Beads in the Ear (A Case Series) and Literature Review.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/00034894221133768.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.