Journal of medicine · 2003
Thioacetamide-induced hepatic damage in a rat nutritional model of steatohepatitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Avni Yona, Shirin Haim, Aeed Hussein, Matas Zipora, Shahmurov Mark, Birkenfeld Shlomo, Bruck Rafael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is most often attributed to the effects of obesity, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and drugs. It is still unknown whether livers with steatohepatitis are more vulnerable to toxic damage.
AIM: To determine the effect of the hepatotoxicant thioacetamide in a rat nutritional model of hepatic steatohepatitis.
METHODS: Fatty liver was induced in rats by placing them on a methionine-choline deficient diet for one month. Thioacetamide was administered by 3 consecutive intraperitoneal injections (300 mg/kg) at 24 h intervals.
RESULTS: Following treatment with thioacetamide, the elevated serum levels of liver enzymes and blood ammonia, liver necrotic inflammation and the survival rate after 48 h were not different between rats with normal or fatty liver. However, those parameters were significantly worse when fatty liver regressed after return to normal diet for one month (p < 0.01). Western blot analysis of hepatic extracts revealed no difference in cytochrome P4502E1 levels between fatty livers and fatty livers after regression, suggesting that the enhanced hepatotoxicity after regression of fatty liver could not be attributed to increased cytochrome P4502E1.
CONCLUSIONS: In a nutritional model of steatohepatitis, rats with fatty liver were not more vulnerable than normal rats to liver damage induced by thioacetamide. However, liver damage was significantly more severe in rats with fatty livers after one month regression of steatosis.
AIM: To determine the effect of the hepatotoxicant thioacetamide in a rat nutritional model of hepatic steatohepatitis.
METHODS: Fatty liver was induced in rats by placing them on a methionine-choline deficient diet for one month. Thioacetamide was administered by 3 consecutive intraperitoneal injections (300 mg/kg) at 24 h intervals.
RESULTS: Following treatment with thioacetamide, the elevated serum levels of liver enzymes and blood ammonia, liver necrotic inflammation and the survival rate after 48 h were not different between rats with normal or fatty liver. However, those parameters were significantly worse when fatty liver regressed after return to normal diet for one month (p < 0.01). Western blot analysis of hepatic extracts revealed no difference in cytochrome P4502E1 levels between fatty livers and fatty livers after regression, suggesting that the enhanced hepatotoxicity after regression of fatty liver could not be attributed to increased cytochrome P4502E1.
CONCLUSIONS: In a nutritional model of steatohepatitis, rats with fatty liver were not more vulnerable than normal rats to liver damage induced by thioacetamide. However, liver damage was significantly more severe in rats with fatty livers after one month regression of steatosis.