Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society · 2007
Postoperative anorectal manometric evaluation of patients with anorectal malformation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Senel Emrah, Demirbag Suzi, Tiryaki Tugrul, Erdogan Derya, Cetinkursun Salih, Cakmak Ozden
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a common problem after reconstructive surgery for anorectal malformations. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of clinical scores and anorectal manometry in patients, who have been operated on for anorectal malformations.
METHODS: In total, 18 patients who underwent surgery for anorectal malformation between 1999 and 2004 were investigated for anal continence. For the assessment of the patients' continence, Kelly's clinical scoring, Kiesewetter-Chang scoring, and anorectal manometry were used.
RESULTS: In the intermediate level anorectal malformations, average anal resting pressure was found as 58.16 +/- 8.14 cmH(2)O and in high level anorectal malformations was found as 40.16 +/- 17.4 cmH(2)O. In the continence score, good according to Kelly and Kiesewetter-Chang scoring systems was an average anal resting pressure value of 57.92 +/- 8.57 cmH(2)O and in fair or bad was found as 32 +/- 12.83 cmH(2)O. There were significant differences between the scoring systems anorectal malformation level, and average anal resting pressure values (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometric evaluation of the patients in postoperative period with anorectal malformation can give more realistic information about the patient continence status in anorectal malformations.
METHODS: In total, 18 patients who underwent surgery for anorectal malformation between 1999 and 2004 were investigated for anal continence. For the assessment of the patients' continence, Kelly's clinical scoring, Kiesewetter-Chang scoring, and anorectal manometry were used.
RESULTS: In the intermediate level anorectal malformations, average anal resting pressure was found as 58.16 +/- 8.14 cmH(2)O and in high level anorectal malformations was found as 40.16 +/- 17.4 cmH(2)O. In the continence score, good according to Kelly and Kiesewetter-Chang scoring systems was an average anal resting pressure value of 57.92 +/- 8.57 cmH(2)O and in fair or bad was found as 32 +/- 12.83 cmH(2)O. There were significant differences between the scoring systems anorectal malformation level, and average anal resting pressure values (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometric evaluation of the patients in postoperative period with anorectal malformation can give more realistic information about the patient continence status in anorectal malformations.