DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.123
Is Complex Sphenoidal Sinus Anatomy a Contraindication to a Transsphenoidal Approach for Resection of Sellar Lesions? Case Series and Review of the Literature.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The transsphenoidal approach is considered the gold standard for resection of pituitary adenomas and other sellar region lesions. This approach is guided by a few fundamental anatomic landmarks that conduct the surgeon toward the sellar floor. Some anatomic structures may vary a lot (e.g., intrasphenoidal septa, intercarotid distance) and may be difficult to identify. Pneumatization and conformation of the sphenoidal sinus (SS) plays a key role in accessing the floor of the sella and other skull base structures. A poorly pneumatized SS may be a relative contraindication to the transsphenoidal approach. We analyzed outcome and complications in transsphenoidal surgery for sellar lesions with a difficult SS.
METHODS
We analyzed 243 consecutive patients who underwent a transsphenoidal approach for sellar lesions. Patients with poor pneumatization of the SS were included. Neurosurgical and endocrinologic outcomes were reported.
RESULTS
Successful treatment using a transsphenoidal approach with neuronavigation and Doppler ultrasound was achieved in 15 patients with a low degree of pneumatization of the SS. A pituitary adenoma was present in 13 of 15 patients. Endocrinologic and neurosurgical outcomes were similar to patients with normal pneumatization of the SS, showing a cure of disease in 6 of 9 patients with functioning adenomas and an improvement of symptoms in cases of nonfunctioning adenomas.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with a poorly pneumatized SS can be treated safely with a transsphenoidal approach using image guidance techniques to avoid major neurovascular complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.