Aberrant cortical neurodevelopment in major depressive disorder.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
There is strong neuroimaging evidence that cortical alterations represent a core pathophysiological feature of major depressive disorder (MDD). Differential contributions of cortical features of neurodevelopmental origin, which may distinctly contribute to MDD vulnerability, disease-onset, or symptom expression, are unclear at present.
METHODS
We investigated distinct markers of cortical neurodevelopment, i.e. local cortical gyrification (LGI) and thickness (CT) in patients with MDD (n = 38) and healthy controls (HC, n = 22) using 3 T structural magnetic resonance imaging data and surface-based data analysis techniques. CT and LGI were computed using the Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT12). Analyses were performed for the entire cortical surface followed by a complementary regions-of-interest approach.
RESULTS
MDD patients showed significantly greater LGI in frontal, cingulate, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions compared to HC (FDR-corrected at p < 0.05 using threshold-free cluster enhancement). No significant differences of CT were found. In the MDD-group, correlations were found between duration of illness in years and number of depressive episodes and LGI of frontal, temporal, and parietal regions (p < 0.05).
LIMITATIONS: Main limitations are the relatively modest sample size and a cross-sectional study design. We did not control for early environmental factors potentially influencing neurodevelopment, such as childhood trauma. We report associations uncorrected for multiple comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest different local trajectories of cortical change in MDD. In addition, our data support the notion that aberrant cortical development may serve as a vulnerability marker of MDD, as well as a potential predictor of disease course.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.