MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017221.08072015

Медицинская библиотека · Ciencia & saude coletiva · 2017

[Quality of life of family caregivers of adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review].

Prudente Cejane Oliveira Martins, Ribeiro Maysa Ferreira Martins, Porto Celmo Celeno

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The scope of this study was to analyze the quality of life of family caregivers of adults with spinal cord injury. Two researchers conducted a systematic review independently, based on articles published between 2000 to 2014, using the key words quality of life and caregivers or family and spinal cord, in Portuguese, English and Spanish. The search was conducted in the Virtual Health Library (BVS) and the United States National Library of Medicine (PubMED) databases. Caregivers of tetraplegics have a worse quality of life than caregivers of paraplegics. Changes in the quality of life for the caregivers were not significant over time. Different results were observed when comparing caregivers of adults with spinal cord injury and healthy subjects. Factors that negatively influence the quality of life of caregivers were the presence of chronic disease; greater care time, age and number of children; and lower schooling level of caregivers. There is a need for public health policy development and preparation of more comprehensive intervention strategies that include not only the patient but also the caregiver.

Для цитирования: Prudente Cejane Oliveira Martins, Ribeiro Maysa Ferreira Martins, Porto Celmo Celeno. [Quality of life of family caregivers of adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review].. Ciencia & saude coletiva. 2017. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232017221.08072015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.