Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2025
Sensitivity of ophthalmologists, residents, and optometrists in identifying peripheral retinal tears on ultra-widefield imaging.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jung Jesse J, Chan Xavier, Cheong Kai Xiong, Dan Yee Shan, Cheng John Y, Lai Eric W, Li Huanye, Hoang Quan V
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of 3 groups of masked graders with varying levels of ophthalmic training to identify peripheral retinal breaks utilizing ultra-widefield orthogonal, directed peripheral steering, and auto-montaged images.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS: 155 patients from a single vitreoretinal specialist's practice.
METHODS: 221 eyes with pretreatment orthogonal, directed-peripheral steering, and auto-montage that underwent laser retinopexy for retinal tears between 2015 and 2021 were divided into 2 groups: treatment-naïve and control. Combined sensitivity and specificity of identifying all retinal breaks on orthogonal, directed-peripheral steering, and auto-montaged imaging were calculated compared with the gold standard of mydriatic, scleral depression examination. Linear probability modeling was performed to calculate the required surface area from auto-montage images to identify breaks that were missed initially on orthogonal images.
RESULTS: For orthogonal images, combined sensitivity was highest for ophthalmologists (67.53%), residents (62.34%), and then optometrists (55.84%). The sensitivity increased for orthogonal/steering (ophthalmologists [85.71%], residents [77.92%], and optometrists [67.53%]) and auto-montage (ophthalmologists [85.51%], residents (80.28%), and optometrists [75.00%]). To ensure identification of all tears with auto-montage that was initially missed on grading the orthogonal image, for every 10% increase in montage surface area, there was a 4.8 percentage point (%p) increase in the likelihood of detecting a retinal tear on montage image grading (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Masked graders had moderate sensitivity in identifying retinal breaks with ultra-widefield images. Even with directed-peripheral steering and auto-montage, optometrists had the lowest sensitivity compared to ophthalmology residents and general ophthalmologists and required increased surface area to identify all retinal breaks.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS: 155 patients from a single vitreoretinal specialist's practice.
METHODS: 221 eyes with pretreatment orthogonal, directed-peripheral steering, and auto-montage that underwent laser retinopexy for retinal tears between 2015 and 2021 were divided into 2 groups: treatment-naïve and control. Combined sensitivity and specificity of identifying all retinal breaks on orthogonal, directed-peripheral steering, and auto-montaged imaging were calculated compared with the gold standard of mydriatic, scleral depression examination. Linear probability modeling was performed to calculate the required surface area from auto-montage images to identify breaks that were missed initially on orthogonal images.
RESULTS: For orthogonal images, combined sensitivity was highest for ophthalmologists (67.53%), residents (62.34%), and then optometrists (55.84%). The sensitivity increased for orthogonal/steering (ophthalmologists [85.71%], residents [77.92%], and optometrists [67.53%]) and auto-montage (ophthalmologists [85.51%], residents (80.28%), and optometrists [75.00%]). To ensure identification of all tears with auto-montage that was initially missed on grading the orthogonal image, for every 10% increase in montage surface area, there was a 4.8 percentage point (%p) increase in the likelihood of detecting a retinal tear on montage image grading (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Masked graders had moderate sensitivity in identifying retinal breaks with ultra-widefield images. Even with directed-peripheral steering and auto-montage, optometrists had the lowest sensitivity compared to ophthalmology residents and general ophthalmologists and required increased surface area to identify all retinal breaks.