MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000077582

Медицинская библиотека · Psychopathology · 2004

Kleptomania: comorbid psychiatric diagnosis in patients and their families.

Dannon Pinhas N, Lowengrub Katherine M, Iancu Iulian, Kotler Moshe

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Kleptomania, defined by DSM-IV as the inability to resist the impulse to steal objects which are not needed for personal use or for their monetary value, may reflect a form of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder and/or affective spectrum disorder.

METHODS

Twenty-one kleptomanic patients and 57 first-degree relatives completed a semistructured DSM-IV-based interview and questionnaires. Questionnaires are: the HDRS-17 (the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression), the HARS (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety), the Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale), the YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale). The two groups were compared to demographically matched normal controls (n = 64).

RESULTS

We found a high prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders in our sample of kleptomanic patients and their first-degree relatives. In addition, the scores on the HDRS, HARS, and Y-BOCS were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding of a high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in kleptomanic patients could lead to the development of new treatment strategies for this disorder. Furthermore, the pattern of psychiatric disorders seen in the first-degree relatives can lead to new insights about the nosology and etiopathology of kleptomania.

Для цитирования: Dannon Pinhas N, Lowengrub Katherine M, Iancu Iulian, Kotler Moshe. Kleptomania: comorbid psychiatric diagnosis in patients and their families.. Psychopathology. 2004. DOI: 10.1159/000077582.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.