Journal of pain and symptom management · 2016
Psychosocial Assessment by Hospice Social Workers: A Content Review of Instruments From a National Sample.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cagle John G, Osteen Philip, Sacco Paul, Jacobson Frey Jodi
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Hospice social workers are charged with completing a psychosocial assessment for every new enrollee. This assessment is part of the patient's comprehensive assessment and serves to inform the plan of care and key quality indicators.
OBJECTIVES: To review the content of hospice social work assessments because little is known about what assessment topics are included or overlooked.
METHODS: Using a cluster random sample from all 50 states, we contacted hospice agencies and requested a blank copy of the social work assessment completed at intake. We then systematically reviewed the content of these assessments to determine which domains were included and which were omitted. A total of 105 hospice agencies participated (response rate 42%). Among the assessments provided, 76 (72%) were unique assessments.
RESULTS: Participating hospices were largely freestanding (65%), nonprofit (60%), and either medium (39%) or small (37%) in terms of average daily census. Over 60% of the sample, assessments included content on the following: financial resources; family structure; coping resources; bereavement risk; past losses; caregiver depression; religiosity/spirituality; patient anxiety, patient depression; and advance directives. However, most assessments did not include items evaluating the following: patient physical/functional status; preferences for treatment/care; awareness of diagnosis, prognosis, or disease progression; communication and literacy issues; changes in relationship intimacy/sexuality; and cultural values, beliefs, and customs.
CONCLUSION: Hospice social workers should consider modifying their assessment practices to include a comprehensive array of assessment topics pertinent to patients and families. An accurate, comprehensive assessment that contributes to a holistic, interdisciplinary approach will likely lead to better clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To review the content of hospice social work assessments because little is known about what assessment topics are included or overlooked.
METHODS: Using a cluster random sample from all 50 states, we contacted hospice agencies and requested a blank copy of the social work assessment completed at intake. We then systematically reviewed the content of these assessments to determine which domains were included and which were omitted. A total of 105 hospice agencies participated (response rate 42%). Among the assessments provided, 76 (72%) were unique assessments.
RESULTS: Participating hospices were largely freestanding (65%), nonprofit (60%), and either medium (39%) or small (37%) in terms of average daily census. Over 60% of the sample, assessments included content on the following: financial resources; family structure; coping resources; bereavement risk; past losses; caregiver depression; religiosity/spirituality; patient anxiety, patient depression; and advance directives. However, most assessments did not include items evaluating the following: patient physical/functional status; preferences for treatment/care; awareness of diagnosis, prognosis, or disease progression; communication and literacy issues; changes in relationship intimacy/sexuality; and cultural values, beliefs, and customs.
CONCLUSION: Hospice social workers should consider modifying their assessment practices to include a comprehensive array of assessment topics pertinent to patients and families. An accurate, comprehensive assessment that contributes to a holistic, interdisciplinary approach will likely lead to better clinical outcomes.