MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.028

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2018

A Case Report of Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma: A 9-Year Journey from the Brain to the Spine.

Sweid Ahmad, Noureldine Mohammad Hassan A, Nasser Selim, Badra Mohammad, Saikali Ibrahim

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) are rare and aggressive vascular mesenchymal tumors. Unlike meningiomas, which have a similar radiologic appearance, these tumors have a higher risk of local recurrence after resection, and distant metastasis can reach up to 23%. Metastases to the vertebral bones from an intracranial HPC are very rare, with so far only 9 cases reported in the literature.

CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the case of a 46-year-old man who was surgically treated for a presumed left parieto-occipital falx meningioma in 2008. He presented 9 years later with a thoracic vertebral mass that was causing relentless pain. Reexamination of the cranial pathology allowed correction of the diagnosis performed in 2008 to a meningeal HPC, and the spinal lesion was confirmed after surgery to be a metastatic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature lacks randomized controlled trials and large studies defining the natural history of HPC to draw clear recommendations for a precise management of the disease. However, en bloc resection followed by radiation therapy seems to provide the optimal treatment for a long disease-free survival.

Для цитирования: Sweid Ahmad, Noureldine Mohammad Hassan A, Nasser Selim, Badra Mohammad, Saikali Ibrahim. A Case Report of Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma: A 9-Year Journey from the Brain to the Spine.. World neurosurgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.028.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.