MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy · 2010

[Two cases of unstable angina in patients treated with bevacizumab].

Okada Yoshinobu, Okura Yuji, Takii Yasumasa

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Adverse events associated with bevacizumab (BV) were haemorrhage, impaired wound healing and arterial thromboembolism. We report 2 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unstable angina soon after administration of chemotherapy including BV. CASE 1: A 74-year-old male with rectal cancer and simultaneous liver metastases was admitted to our hospital for unstable angina. Before admission he had received 4 courses of chemotherapy including BV. He had no coronary risk factors besides old age. Since coronary angiography (CAG) revealed significant stenosis in the mid-left circumflex coronary artery, PCI with a coronary stent was performed without any complications. CASE 2: A 67-year-old male with colon cancer and liver and lung metastases was referred to our Dept. of Internal Medicine for unstable angina. Before referral, he had undergone 28 courses of chemotherapy including BV. He had a history of familial hyperlipidemia and smoking. Since CAG revealed significant stenoses in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, PCI with coronary stents was performed without any complications. These 2 patients had no angina after PCI. PCI with coronary stent was safely performed in this patient with unstable angina soon after administration of chemotherapy including BV.

Для цитирования: Okada Yoshinobu, Okura Yuji, Takii Yasumasa. [Two cases of unstable angina in patients treated with bevacizumab].. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.