MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archneurol.2011.832

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of neurology · 2012

Association between paroxysmal tonic spasms and neuromyelitis optica.

Usmani Nida, Bedi Gurdesh, Lam Byron L, Sheremata William A

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of the association between tonic spasms and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) at our center.

DESIGN

An institutional review board-approved retrospective study of clinical, serological, and radiographic characteristics of patients with NMO.

SETTING

Multiple sclerosis center.

PATIENTS: Patients with NMO treated at our center between 1990 and 2008.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Records were examined for documentation of tonic spasms.

RESULTS

Of 110 patients with International Classification of Diseases code 341, 57 patients met diagnostic criteria for NMO. Of these, 8 patients (14%) had documented typical tonic spasms (median age at onset, 39.5 years; range, 13.8-54.2 years). Of those patients, 4 were African American, 3 were Hispanic, and 1 was white. Only 1 was male. The NMO-IgG antibody was found in 1 of 6 patients tested. Tonic spasms appeared after a mean of 24.6 months (range, 0-91 months). In 2 of 57 patients meeting NMO criteria, tonic spasms accompanied their initial episodes. Seven of 8 patients who had tonic spasms responded to treatment with carbamazepine within 1 week.

CONCLUSION

Tonic spasms are associated with NMO more commonly than with multiple sclerosis and may be a presenting sign in both diseases.

Для цитирования: Usmani Nida, Bedi Gurdesh, Lam Byron L, Sheremata William A. Association between paroxysmal tonic spasms and neuromyelitis optica.. Archives of neurology. 2012. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.832.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.