Current vascular pharmacology · 2018
Prolonging Ticagrelor Beyond a Year of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Worth or Harmful?
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aradi Daniel, Dezsi Dome, Veress Gabor, Merkely Bela
Аннотация
Platelet activation plays a central role in triggering and complicating acute coronary syndromes, especially in case of stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction. On top of aspirin, P2Y12- inhibitors are successfully used to treat and prevent these events for a duration of one year after an acute coronary episode or 6 months after drug-eluting stent implantation. However, patients with acute coronary syndromes remain at heightened risk for recurrent ischemic events after the recommended durations of P2Y12-inhibitors and therefore, prolonging treatment is often considered in clinical practice. However, the higher risk for bleeding limits the utility of such approach to a restricted group who is still poorly defined by available measures. This review aims to discuss potential benefits and highlight important pitfalls of prolonged treatment with P2Y12-inhibitors, with a focus on ticagrelor, an attractive reversible P2Y12-inhibitor in patients after myocardial infarction.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute Coronary SyndromeClinical Decision-MakingDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug-Eluting StentsHemorrhageHumansPatient SelectionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRecurrenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTicagrelorTime FactorsTreatment Outcome