The Journal of clinical dentistry · 2011
Safety of an intra-oral hearing device utilizing a split-mouth research design.
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miller Ross, Hujoel Philippe, Murray Michael, Popelka Gerald R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The auditory deficits of Single Sided Deafness (SSD) can be treated effectively with a novel device, SoundBite, that delivers sound by applying imperceptible vibratory signals to the teeth (hereafter referred to as an intra-oral hearing device). The intra-oral hearing device is placed around two maxillary teeth and is similar to a small partial denture or retainer. The goal of this study was to report how this removable hearing device affects the oral structures.
METHODS: Twenty-two SSD patients wearing an intra-oral hearing device were enrolled in a prospective study for six months. Differences (delta) between the device-anchoring teeth and the equivalent contralateral non-device teeth were evaluated with four dental parameters using a paired t-test. Hearing thresholds were evaluated as a function of alveolar bone support using linear regression.
RESULTS: Compared to the non-device teeth, the hearing device teeth did not exhibit any increased recession (delta = 0.1 mm, p-value = 0.48), increased pocket depth (delta = 0.0 mm, p-value = 0.48), increased root resorption (delta = 4%, p-value = 0.43), or increased alveolar bone loss (delta = 0.0 %, p-value = 0.43). There was no association between the amount of alveolar support and hearing thresholds (delta = 0.2, p-value = 0.34).
CONCLUSION: The intra-oral component of the hearing device did not adversely affect the dental structures of the subjects in this trial.
METHODS: Twenty-two SSD patients wearing an intra-oral hearing device were enrolled in a prospective study for six months. Differences (delta) between the device-anchoring teeth and the equivalent contralateral non-device teeth were evaluated with four dental parameters using a paired t-test. Hearing thresholds were evaluated as a function of alveolar bone support using linear regression.
RESULTS: Compared to the non-device teeth, the hearing device teeth did not exhibit any increased recession (delta = 0.1 mm, p-value = 0.48), increased pocket depth (delta = 0.0 mm, p-value = 0.48), increased root resorption (delta = 4%, p-value = 0.43), or increased alveolar bone loss (delta = 0.0 %, p-value = 0.43). There was no association between the amount of alveolar support and hearing thresholds (delta = 0.2, p-value = 0.34).
CONCLUSION: The intra-oral component of the hearing device did not adversely affect the dental structures of the subjects in this trial.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAlveolar Bone LossAlveolar ProcessAuditory ThresholdBone ConductionEquipment DesignEquipment SafetyFemaleGingival RecessionHearing AidsHearing Loss, UnilateralHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedPeriodontal IndexPeriodontal PocketProspective StudiesRadiography, BitewingRoot ResorptionToothVibration