MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ejo/cjab003

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of orthodontics · 2021

Dental anomalies frequency in submucous cleft palate versus complete cleft palate.

Schwartz João Paulo, Garib Daniela Gamba

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study evaluated the prevalence of dental anomalies of number in different subphenotypes of isolated cleft palate.

MATERIALS/

METHODS

The sample comprised 26 individuals with submucous cleft palate (group S) and 68 individuals with complete cleft palate (group C) aged between 9 and 12 years from a single centre. Panoramic radiographs were evaluated regarding the presence of dental anomalies of number in permanent teeth. Intergroup comparison was performed using chi-square tests (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Tooth agenesis was found in 34.61 and 36.76 per cent of group S and group C, respectively. The most commonly missing teeth were the maxillary second premolar, maxillary lateral incisor, and mandibular second premolar. Supernumerary teeth were found in none and 1.47 per cent of the individuals with submucous and complete cleft palate, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between groups for the frequency of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth.

LIMITATIONS: Only dental anomalies of number were evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Individuals with submucous and complete cleft palate showed similar prevalence for tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth. Dental anomalies frequency seems not to be a discriminator for subphenotypes of cleft palate.

Для цитирования: Schwartz João Paulo, Garib Daniela Gamba. Dental anomalies frequency in submucous cleft palate versus complete cleft palate.. European journal of orthodontics. 2021. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjab003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.