MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/515265

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infectious diseases · 1998

Field trial of a vaccine against New World cutaneous leishmaniasis in an at-risk child population: safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy during the first 12 months of follow-up.

Armijos R X, Weigel M M, Aviles H, Maldonado R, Racines J

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a vaccine against cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural Ecuadorian children was assessed in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Vaccine group subjects received 2 intradermal doses of a whole, killed promastigote vaccine cocktail plus bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) adjuvant. Control subjects got 2 doses of BCG only. The subjects who received both vaccination doses, 438 in the vaccine group (79.3%) and 406 in the control group (83.4%), were followed for 12 months. No serious adverse side effects were identified in either group. Significantly more vaccine group subjects than controls converted to a positive Montenegro skin test (85.1% vs. 20.1%; chi2 = 279; P < .001). The incidence of cutaneous leishmaniasis was significantly reduced in the vaccine compared with the control group (2.1% vs. 7.6%; chi2 = 8.95; P < .003). The protective efficacy of the vaccine was 72.9% (95% confidence interval = 36.1%-88.5%).

Для цитирования: Armijos R X, Weigel M M, Aviles H, Maldonado R, Racines J. Field trial of a vaccine against New World cutaneous leishmaniasis in an at-risk child population: safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy during the first 12 months of follow-up.. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1998. DOI: 10.1086/515265.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.