Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026
Colon interposition after esophagectomy: a 15-year single-center experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kemeter Melissa, Thumfart Lucas, Heger Patrick, Hüttner Felix J, Diener Markus K, Giulini Luca, Dubecz Attila
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Colonic interposition is the preferred option for alimentary tract reconstruction when a gastric conduit pull-up is not feasible. Aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing colonic interposition for various indications in our tertiary-care center over a 15-year period.
METHODS: Following institutional board approval, all consecutive patients who underwent colonic interposition for esophageal replacement were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Comprehensive chart review and descriptive statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (62 men, 31 women, median age 65 years, IQR 55.5-72) underwent colonic interposition between January 2009 and December 2023. Benign disease was present in 17.2%, whereas malignancy accounted for 82.8%. A hand-sewn cervical anastomosis was performed in 96.8% of patients. The colonic graft, predominantly based on the left colic artery (89.2%) was routed through the posterior mediastinum in 51.6% and via the retrosternal route in 47.3%. Median operative time was 303 min (IQR 247.5-364). Major complications included anastomotic leakage (28%), anastomotic stenosis (30.1%), pleural empyema (11.8%), and postoperative bleeding (10.8%). The reoperation rate was 38.7%, with a median hospital stay of 29 days (IQR 20-63). In-hospital mortality was 18.3%.
CONCLUSION: Colonic interposition after esophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in the salvage and secondary reconstruction setting, and should be confined to experienced, high-volume centers.
CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: FMS_D_007.23-I-1.
METHODS: Following institutional board approval, all consecutive patients who underwent colonic interposition for esophageal replacement were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Comprehensive chart review and descriptive statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (62 men, 31 women, median age 65 years, IQR 55.5-72) underwent colonic interposition between January 2009 and December 2023. Benign disease was present in 17.2%, whereas malignancy accounted for 82.8%. A hand-sewn cervical anastomosis was performed in 96.8% of patients. The colonic graft, predominantly based on the left colic artery (89.2%) was routed through the posterior mediastinum in 51.6% and via the retrosternal route in 47.3%. Median operative time was 303 min (IQR 247.5-364). Major complications included anastomotic leakage (28%), anastomotic stenosis (30.1%), pleural empyema (11.8%), and postoperative bleeding (10.8%). The reoperation rate was 38.7%, with a median hospital stay of 29 days (IQR 20-63). In-hospital mortality was 18.3%.
CONCLUSION: Colonic interposition after esophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in the salvage and secondary reconstruction setting, and should be confined to experienced, high-volume centers.
CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: FMS_D_007.23-I-1.