Clinical oral investigations · 2012
Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Olszewski R, Frison L, Wisniewski M, Denis J M, Vynckier S, Cosnard G, Zech F, Reychler H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare the reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) surface rendering using clinical protocols based on low-dose (35-mAs) spiral CT and cone-beam CT (I-CAT). The absorbed dose levels for radiosensitive organs in the maxillofacial region during exposure in both 3D-CT protocols were also assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of ten human dry skulls examined with low-dose CT and cone-beam CT. Two independent observers identified 24 cephalometric anatomic landmarks at 13 sites on the 3D-CT surface renderings using both protocols, with each observer repeating the identification 1 month later. A total of 1,920 imaging measurements were performed. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at six sites around the thyroid gland, the submandibular glands, and the eyes in an Alderson phantom to measure the absorbed dose levels.
RESULTS: When comparing low-dose CT and cone-beam CT protocols, the cone-beam CT protocol proved to be significantly more reproducible for four of the 13 anatomical sites. There was no significant difference between the protocols for the other nine anatomical sites. Both low-dose and cone-beam CT protocols were equivalent in dose absorption to the eyes and submandibular glands. However, thyroid glands were more irradiated with low-dose CT.
CONCLUSIONS: Cone-beam CT was more reproducible and procured less irradiation to the thyroid gland than low-dose CT.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cone-beam CT should be preferred over low-dose CT for developing three-dimensional bony cephalometric analyses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of ten human dry skulls examined with low-dose CT and cone-beam CT. Two independent observers identified 24 cephalometric anatomic landmarks at 13 sites on the 3D-CT surface renderings using both protocols, with each observer repeating the identification 1 month later. A total of 1,920 imaging measurements were performed. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at six sites around the thyroid gland, the submandibular glands, and the eyes in an Alderson phantom to measure the absorbed dose levels.
RESULTS: When comparing low-dose CT and cone-beam CT protocols, the cone-beam CT protocol proved to be significantly more reproducible for four of the 13 anatomical sites. There was no significant difference between the protocols for the other nine anatomical sites. Both low-dose and cone-beam CT protocols were equivalent in dose absorption to the eyes and submandibular glands. However, thyroid glands were more irradiated with low-dose CT.
CONCLUSIONS: Cone-beam CT was more reproducible and procured less irradiation to the thyroid gland than low-dose CT.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cone-beam CT should be preferred over low-dose CT for developing three-dimensional bony cephalometric analyses.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Anatomic LandmarksCephalometryCone-Beam Computed TomographyEthmoid BoneEyeFacial BonesFrontal BoneHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaxillaNasal BoneOccipital BoneOrbitPalate, HardPetrous BonePhantoms, ImagingPterygopalatine FossaRadiation DosageReproducibility of ResultsSkullSphenoid BoneSubmandibular GlandTemporal BoneThermoluminescent DosimetryThyroid GlandTomography, Spiral ComputedZygoma