Current protocols · 2026
Comparison of Core Stabilization Exercises versus Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.
СтатьяПротокол клинического исследованияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fatima Tabassum, Khan Zainy, Rehman Sana, Abbas Ali, Veqar Zubia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by impaired neuromuscular control, reduced postural stability, and functional deficits. Core stabilization exercises (CSE) are widely used but may have limitations in coordinated, multi-muscle activation. Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS), based on developmental kinesiology, seeks to restore neuromuscular control by engaging integrated diaphragm and core muscle activation. Despite their clinical use, direct comparative evidence between CSE and DNS in NSCLBP remains scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of DNS and CSE on pain, lumbar muscle electromyography (EMG) activity, balance, posture, kinesiophobia, and quality of life in patients with NSCLBP Methods: This study will include two parallel groups. A total of 34 participants aged between 20 and 50 years diagnosed with NSCLBP will be recruited on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The participants will be divided into two groups: (1) DNS with interferential therapy (IFT) and hot pack (n = 17) and (2) core stabilization exercises with IFT and hot pack (n = 17). The intervention will be given 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures will include pain intensity, EMG activity of erector spinae and multifidus muscles, balance, posture analysis, kinesiophobia, and health-related quality of life. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and post-intervention.
RESULTS: Normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Baseline differences will be analyzed by independent samples t-tests, and intervention effects by mixed-design ANOVA.
DISCUSSION: Both DNS and CSE are expected to improve pain, neuromuscular activity, balance, posture, kinesiophobia, and quality of life. Comparing objective outcomes across groups will identify which intervention offers greater clinical benefit.
CONCLUSION: This trial will provide evidence to guide clinicians in selecting the most effective exercise intervention for NSCLBP rehabilitation. © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of DNS and CSE on pain, lumbar muscle electromyography (EMG) activity, balance, posture, kinesiophobia, and quality of life in patients with NSCLBP Methods: This study will include two parallel groups. A total of 34 participants aged between 20 and 50 years diagnosed with NSCLBP will be recruited on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The participants will be divided into two groups: (1) DNS with interferential therapy (IFT) and hot pack (n = 17) and (2) core stabilization exercises with IFT and hot pack (n = 17). The intervention will be given 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Outcome measures will include pain intensity, EMG activity of erector spinae and multifidus muscles, balance, posture analysis, kinesiophobia, and health-related quality of life. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and post-intervention.
RESULTS: Normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Baseline differences will be analyzed by independent samples t-tests, and intervention effects by mixed-design ANOVA.
DISCUSSION: Both DNS and CSE are expected to improve pain, neuromuscular activity, balance, posture, kinesiophobia, and quality of life. Comparing objective outcomes across groups will identify which intervention offers greater clinical benefit.
CONCLUSION: This trial will provide evidence to guide clinicians in selecting the most effective exercise intervention for NSCLBP rehabilitation. © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.